Sharon Gaudin, Computerworld If Twitter decides to sue Web sites and bloggers that published information pilfered from its systems by hackers, the company could be diving into murky and largely untested legal waters. Biz Stone, co-founder of the microblogging site, confirmed in a blog post yesterday that a hacker gained access to the personal e-mail account of a Twitter employee and with that was able to lift private company documents. At that point, the hacker offered the information to various blogs and online publications.

GS – Ex-Gator Moss now a linebacker Hmm. Jarvis says he feels right at home playing LB. So, you mean the Broncos shouldn’t have traded UP in the first round to take an undersized DE who is miscast positionally? Oh. Whoops. Hopefully the switch works out. Athlon – 2009 Denver Broncos Preview Hmm. Magazine sales must be dropping. Or, at least they should be; Athlon still has J.J. Arrington and Boss Bailey on the team, while the retention of Bobby Turner and Rick Dennison is ignored to say the blocking scheme will be totally different.

« Facebook Finding Under Canada’s Privacy Law: Adequate Safeguards Not in Place | Main | Amazon Deletes Books From Kindle in Rights Dispute » In a somewhat controversial move TechCrunch has decided to selectively publish and review some of the 310 confidential Twitter documents it received from a hacker. About the decision to publish, TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington wrote “the vast majority of these documents aren’t going to be published, at least by us.